GPT Image 2.5 questions, answered
Twenty questions people ask about this release, answered from OpenAI's own announcement, model pages and system card where possible.
Answers below draw on OpenAI's announcement of September 8, 2026, the two developer model pages for Flare and Sunburst, the deployment safety hub system card, and contemporaneous reporting. Where something is not published, this page says so rather than guessing — which happens more often than you would expect for a model this new.
When was GPT Image 2.5 released?
Is it called GPT Image 2.5 or ChatGPT Images 2.5?
Who can use it?
What replaced what?
What are the model IDs?
What is the maximum output resolution?
Does it support transparent backgrounds?
How many quality tiers are there?
What is the latency improvement?
Does GPT Image 2.5 watermark its output?
Can I use generated images commercially?
Is there an official free GPT Image 2.5 generator?
Does it do video?
What is the Sketch feature?
Are templates available in the API?
Which companies shipped with it on day one?
Is GPT Image 2 still available?
Does GPT Image 2.5 pose new safety risks?
How do I estimate my token usage?
Where is the official documentation?
How this release actually arrived
Worth recording, because the search results from the fortnight before launch are still full of pages insisting the model did not exist. They were correct when written.
-
August 2026
Two anonymous checkpoints, mona-lisa-1 and luna-lisa-alpha, appear in public arena blind testing. The community label 'GPT Image 2.5' attaches to them before any official name exists.
-
September 1, 2026
A hidden 'Image creation got a major upgrade' modal is spotted in ChatGPT and Codex builds, with its hero asset freshly uploaded.
-
September 3, 2026
Independent observers call a release imminent. OpenAI has still announced nothing, and a gpt-image-2.5 model page returns 404.
-
September 8, 2026
OpenAI publishes the announcement, two developer model pages, a system card and the ChatGPT rollout, all on the same day. Adobe Firefly ships access simultaneously.
The community guessed the version number correctly and the codenames not at all. Nobody predicted a two-model API split, which turned out to be the structurally interesting part of the release.
Three questions that keep getting answered wrongly
“It is not released yet.” A large number of pages published in the fortnight before launch state flatly that no such model exists, and several of them still rank. They were accurate on the day they were written and are now simply stale. If a page cites a 404 on the model documentation as evidence, check its date before believing it.
“It costs more than the last one.” The token rates did not move. Both new API models bill at the same rates as the model they succeed, which is unusual for a capability upgrade and worth checking against the developer model pages yourself rather than taking anyone's word for it, this site included.
“It does 4K now.” No new resolution ceiling was published with this release. The line's stated maximum has been 2K, and the previous generation's API sizes topped out at 1024×1536 and 1536×1024. If you need native 4K output today, the comparison worth making is against Google's Nano Banana Pro, not against the previous OpenAI model.
What is still genuinely unknown
Per-image costs for the two new quality tiers are not published, and because billing is token-based they cannot be derived from the rate card without measurement. Anyone quoting a firm number for xhigh or max is extrapolating.
Mask behaviour on the edit endpoint has shifted between releases in this family, so inpainting and outpainting workflows carried over from an earlier model deserve a direct test rather than an assumption. The same goes for how content credentials propagate: the chat surface and API responses have not always handled metadata identically.
Finally, independent benchmark placement will take a few weeks to settle. Arena rankings for a model released days ago reflect early, unrepresentative traffic, and the editing arena in particular was already a tight race before this release entered it. Treat any leaderboard position published this month as provisional.